The following is an ethical standard agreement for all parties involved in scientific publications, such as editors, reviewers, and authors:
Cendekiawan Editor: Professional Journal of Academics Primary School Teacher Education Study Program is responsible for making decisions on articles to be published. Editors can be guided by the editor's board policy and are limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor can discuss with the editor or other reviewers in making this decision.
The editor will evaluate articles according to scientific content without regard to the race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or politics of the author.
Editors and editorial staff may not provide any information about articles sent to others other than the appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editor's advisors, and the appropriate publishers.
Conflict of interest
Material not published in the article submitted may not be used for editor's own research without the written consent of the author.
Contribution to Editor's Decisions
The review process can assist the editor in making decisions and through communication between the editor and the writer will help the writer improve the article.
Any selected reviewer who feels ineligible to review the research reported in an article or knows that a quick review is not possible must inform the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Reviews must be made objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not allowed. The reviewer must clearly indicate the results of the assessment together with supporting arguments.
Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. Any statement that observations, derivations, or arguments have been reported before must be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer must also call the editor's attention to the substantial similarities or overlaps between the article under consideration and any other published paper that has personal knowledge.
Conflict of interest
Unpublished material contained in articles may not be used for reviewers' own research without the written permission of the author. Information and special ideas obtained through the review process are kept confidential and are not used for personal purposes. Reviewers should not consider articles that have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative articles, or other relationships with one of the authors, or the company involved with the article.
The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the work carried out as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Main data to be represented accurately in the manuscript. Articles must contain enough detail and references that allow others to do more research. False or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Data Access and Retention
The author is asked to provide raw data related to the text for the editor review process and must be prepared to provide public access to the data, if it can be done, and in any case be prepared to save the data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors must ensure that they have written the original work in its entirety, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others that this has been quoted or quoted correctly.
Multiple, Redundant, or Simultaneous Publications
An author may not, in general, publish articles that basically describe the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same article to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors must cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported.
Authorship must be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research reported. All who have made significant contributions must be registered as co-authors, where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all suitable joint authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and all joint authors have seen and agreed to the final version of the paper and have approved their submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors must disclose in their articles any other financial or substantive conflict of interest that might be interpreted to affect the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
A fundamental error in the published work
When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his self-published work, the author's obligation is to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Papers published in Edutainment: Journal of Education and Education will consider retracting in publication if:
1. They have clear evidence that the findings are not reliable, either as a result of errors (eg data manipulation) or honest errors (eg miscalculations or experimental errors).
2. Previous findings have been published elsewhere without proper cross-references, permits or justifications (eg cases of excessive publication).
3. That is plagiarism.
4. Report unethical research. The revocation mechanism follows the Committee on Publication Ethcis (COPE) Revocation Guidelines.